Revising national standards

All national forest managment stardards are reviewed regularly to ensure they continue to meet expectations and the latest best practices.

Revising national standards

Achieving PEFC endorsement of a national or regional forest certification system is not the final step. Through our endorsement milestones, we ensure that national stardards are reviewed regularly so we know they continue to meet our benchmarks.

We need to ensure that all PEFC endorsed forest certification systems systematically incorporate latest scientific research, practical experiences and best practices from the field, as well as evolving values, expectations and aspirations of society towards sustainable forest management. This is why we have developed a system to ensure PEFC endorsed systems are regularly reviewed, and if necessary, revised.

Endorsement milestones

For a system to maintain its endorsement, it must meet a series of endorsement milestones. These milestones are linked to the national periodic review of the system and the sustainable forest management standard.

PEFC Canada revising its national standard

The first endorsement milestone is the start of the periodic review of the national standard, within five years of the previous national approval. This is the 'review date'. 

The national revision process must start within 12 months of the review date (second milestone) and the system submitted to PEFC for assessment within 24 months of the review date (third milestone).

With the milestones, we are constantly monitoring the endorsed systems, ensuring they respect their national periodic review processes and continue to meet our benchmarks. Systems that miss the milestones risk suspension of their endorsement.

Periodic review

Systems go through a periodic review five years after their national approval (first endorsement milestone). The periodic review includes a gap analysis, public consultation, and consideration of feedback received while the standard is in force.

The periodic review ensures the systems are consistently updated to meet our evolving benchmarks and national and international expectations. A periodic review can have two outcomes:

  • The standard is reaffirmed, i.e. the current version is approved with no changes.
  • The standard is revised.

Assessing revised and reaffirmed national systems

Revised and reaffirmed systems need to be assessed in order to maintain their PEFC endorsement. However, these assessment differ from the more comprehensive review of a new system. PEFC Registered Assessors carry out the assessment of both revised and reaffirmed systems.

Revised systems

Unlike with a new system, the assessment of a revised system can be limited to an assessment of the changes. This approach relies on the previous assessment results and reduces time and cost in the process. For the parts of the system that were not changed, the assessor carries out a comparison against the previously endorsed system to confirm that nothing has changed.

Reaffirmed systems

This assessment focuses on the review process, to ensure that the decision to reaffirm the system is justified and has the support of the relevant stakeholders. An important element is the comparison of the reaffirmed system documents with the previously endorsed system. This comparison ensures that no changes were made and identifies any changes that were not reported.

Keep in touch

Subscribe to our newsletter